Lenovo 20FQ002JAU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FQ002JAU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FQ002JAU
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 14:21
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 145
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 217
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV22L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 340 410 351 410 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 427
Mixed 366
SusWrite 372
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 44.3
144% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 345
262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDFB232A1MA-JD-F EDFB232A1MA-JD-F 16GB
1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FQ002JAU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FQ002JAU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback