Acidanthera iMac18,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcidanthera iMac18,2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-77F17D7DA9285301
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210925
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 12:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 566
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 84.4
54% 69.6 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 42.6
47% 59.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 319 300 304 305 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 467
Mixed 386
SusWrite 326
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.9
209% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 264
223% 324 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST3000NM0005-1V410N 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: BY02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 168 169 170 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 167
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 169
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.1
255% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-053.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,2 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Acidanthera iMac18,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $563
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback