Lenovo 82NJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82NJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 10:54
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS Creator Edition
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 314
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 876
92% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3AAA) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 33.7
19% 26 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 22.8
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 327 325 322 324 325 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,927
Write 1,139
Mixed 807
SusWrite 351
233% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 68.3
233% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 886
692% 958 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 215%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 46.5
SC Mixed 31
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82NJ Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82NJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback