Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 116 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 36.8 1-Core 19 2-Core 37.6 21% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 35.8 8-Core 24.3 4% 30 Pts	64-Core 28.7 2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9806) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 85 85 93 92 98 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.8% Poor	Read 119 Write 108 Mixed 107 SusWrite 92.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 14.7 46% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 53.2 DQ Mixed 33.9 27% 37 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4238344445 017A 37352E4239334445 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.07 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 2.3 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16