Samsung 930XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 930XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930XED-KA1US
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 62
1-Core 189
2-Core 365
105% 205 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 863
95% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C868) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 21.9
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 17.9
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1547 1532 1227 279 399 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 1,505
Mixed 1,248
SusWrite 898
283% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 74.8
245% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 949
695% 902 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 225%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 49
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 28.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 140%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930XED Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 930XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback