Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.8% Poor	Memory 34.5 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 52.1 23% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 88.7 8-Core 90.3 12% 89.5 Pts	64-Core 97.2 6% 97.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8245) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0514A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 232 295 322 282 316 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 383 Write 305 Mixed 270 SusWrite 287 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 11.9 55% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 83.9 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 26.2 39% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 77,702 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 5.6 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 29%, 5,170 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 4,472 samples	2x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GBBench 78%, 11,560 samples	1x
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	1x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16