Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '17 at 03:03
Run Duration	331 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 838 81% 665 Pts	64-Core 1,024 63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E329) CLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Lighting 82.9 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 118 68% 88.4 fps	MRender 63.8 Gravity 80.7 Splatting 82.2 63% 75.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 354GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24521 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 233 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 67 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 182 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7447463480	97.8% Outstanding	Read 526 Write 503 Mixed 514 115% 514 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 25.6 146% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 25.5 32% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 2,149 Write 1,385 Mixed 1,233 351% 1,589 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 28.1 172% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 52.8 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 25.5 35% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 254%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0302 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 105 Write 127 Mixed 115 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.32 96% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 66%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 59GB free, PID a813 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 9.79 Mixed 10.6 16% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.32 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.005 28% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 6.84 Mixed 10.2 14% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.12 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.01 17% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3334 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 45.4 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 32.2 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 25.6 SC Write 43.7 SC Mixed 29.4 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $852

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)