To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 08:35
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 67.8
32% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 174
Write 142
Mixed 122
SusWrite 72.8
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 7
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 8.6
10% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
27GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 58 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 111
Write 120
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 61.1
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
WD WD1600AVJB-63SZA 160GB
22GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 63.2
Mixed 45
SusWrite 53.1
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.97% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback