Asus PU451JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus PU451JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PU451JF
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150317
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 02:29
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 105
52% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 167
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 930M
Asus(1043 23CA) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1277
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 9.6
9% 9.93 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 171 172 168 165 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 416
Write 261
Mixed 238
SusWrite 178
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 14.5
78% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 191
158% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
21GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 166 211 214 212 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 224
Write 188
Mixed 215
SusWrite 199
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 30.5
100% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 190
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PU451JF Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus PU451JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback