MSI MS-1795

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1795  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160203
Uptime35.5 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 23:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 149
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 475
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1640
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 20.9
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 148 129 248 288 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 442
Write 200
Mixed 334
SusWrite 223
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 29.7
120% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 214
180% 264 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 14
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1795 Builds (Compare 1,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1795

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback