Asus X705UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAsus X705UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705UA
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 105
51% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 166
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1A30) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 170
Mixed 134
52% 240 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 25.1
76% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 165
149% 229 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 87%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
923GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 106 122 129 121 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 111
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5644EB0-CPB Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 6GB
2133, 2400 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X705UA Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback