TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16H2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-16H2  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-16H2
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140816
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 13:20
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 193
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 506
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 72.3%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 7.1
3% 9.1 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.45%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,027
Write 600
Mixed 330
143% 652 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 21.9
95% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 105
149% 268 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 237%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
793GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 135
Mixed 29.1
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 64GB
28GB free, PID 1400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.3
Write 25.6
Mixed 27.4
36% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.7
184% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 32%
WLW essentials 8GB
1GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 21
Write 5.2
Mixed 2.2
9% 9.47 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 56.2%
 Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16H2 Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: MSI MS-16H2

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples107x
Core i7-4700HQIntel  $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples44x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples2x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples104x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples34x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples15x
SSD
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples28x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples25x
HFS128G38MNB-2200A 128GBBench 72%, 413 samples21x
RAM
MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,392 samples39x
MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,633 samples36x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 2x8GBAdataBench 52%, 1,843 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback