TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B250 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI B250 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '22 at 06:41
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 202
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 304
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 65.1%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
PNY(196E 11D8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 68.8
58% 72.6 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 57.6%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme GIGABYTE GP-GSM2 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 14.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 180 132 69 77 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 827
Write 781
Mixed 777
SusWrite 130
141% 629 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48
181% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 486
343% 436 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 213%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
103GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 72 75 92 52 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 439
Write 403
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 106
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 6.4
37% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 1.2
78% 185 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 46.9%
 Great: 100%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 67 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 69.4
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 67.4
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 38.6%
 Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 70.1%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B250 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B250 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel  $248Bench 84%, 712,312 samples215x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples151x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples146x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples162x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples116x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples95x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples33x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples32x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples28x
RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL  $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples46x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples43x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples37x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback