Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 545
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 62.5
52% 64.6 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 61.6
52% 64 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 111 82 36 75 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 160
Write 84.7
Mixed 78
SusWrite 79.5
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 34.5
100% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 157
146% 220 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
285GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 58.9
Write 52.9
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 82.5
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
295GB free
Firmware: PB4OCA1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 57 58 60 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 56
Mixed 38
SusWrite 59.1
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 45%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
290GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 72.8
Write 79.4
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 82.7
48% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
7GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 57.6
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 48.3
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MK5055GSX 500GB
396GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 36.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 37.2
47% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $387
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback