Gigabyte B660M DS3H DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B660M DS3H DDR4  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 338
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 851
87% 703 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 144
58% 98.7 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 86.4
78% 96.6 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0818
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 141 135 134 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 444
Write 139
Mixed 145
SusWrite 132
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 10.5
101% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 59.4
65% 108 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 93%
SSD 256GB
108GB free
Firmware: SBFM01.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 427 426 428 410 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 276
Mixed 321
SusWrite 419
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 40
156% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 207
178% 261 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 39.1
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 32
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B660M DS3H DDR4 Builds (Compare 7,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte B660M DS3H DDR4 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback