Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 75.8 1-Core 138 2-Core 277 88% 164 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 937 85% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,467 91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 121 Parallax 132 119% 133 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 137 Splatting 110 114% 144 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$159 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 763GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 387 404 407 409 412 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 435 Mixed 302 SusWrite 400 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 33.6 132% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 186 143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 119%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 577GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1089 1146 1225 1244 1255 1265 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,497 Write 1,266 Mixed 1,019 SusWrite 1204 280% 1,246 MB/s	4K Read 53.4 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 65 228% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 684 DQ Write 706 DQ Mixed 272 321% 554 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 295%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 349GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1183 1240 1261 1252 1235 1244 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,446 Write 1,181 Mixed 1,004 SusWrite 1,236 273% 1,217 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 68.2 229% 80 MB/s	DQ Read 682 DQ Write 727 DQ Mixed 272 324% 560 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 295%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 851GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 101 99 101 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 166 Write 164 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 98.4 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 315% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 104%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 554GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 106 107 107 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 102 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 105 66% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 182 182 183 183 182 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 90.9 Write 62.5 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 180 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 114%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 930GB free, PID 012e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 31 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 39.2 49% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 539 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 33.1 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 31.1 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,664x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,296x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,432x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,250x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,844x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	774x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $851

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16