Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 90.7
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 134
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 141
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 33.2
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 23.7
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 102 104 64 79 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 443
Write 236
Mixed 247
SusWrite 103
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 14.6
90% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 23.7
44% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 74%
Samsun HD501LJ 500GB
130GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 50.4
Write 30.6
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 55.8
33% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 45%
Toshib HDWJ110 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 15 16 11 8.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 45.9
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 14.3
24% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback