Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF705DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF705DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DU
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 23:15
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 230
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 589
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 10DF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62% Good
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 102
Parallax 63.4
60% 79.6 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 72.1
66% 81.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 802 807 800 808 820 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 2,233
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 1,004
418% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 79.8
256% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 904
671% 897 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 281%
Great: 346%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
809GB free
Firmware: CS9006B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 375 370 372 377 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 313
Write 113
Mixed 305
SusWrite 373
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 30.6
123% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 180
150% 216 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Adata 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 26.9
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF705DU Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF705DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback