Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 40 1-Core 59 2-Core 100 38% 66.4 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 186 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0301 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.2 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 0.2 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 104 147 155 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 310 Write 202 Mixed 220 SusWrite 127 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 23.5 92% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 194 156% 223 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	7x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	7x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $112Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 1x8GBABCDBench 24%, 109 samples	6x
123456789012345678 1x16GBABCDBench 22%, 10 samples	1x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $112

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16