PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191029 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 17 '22 at 12:31 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.01
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$81
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 231 232 234 231 232 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$81
264GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 436 438 442 436 437 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 86 86 88 89 88 MB/s
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
304GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 86 86 87 87 86 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965516-100.A00LF 8x8GB
8 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 152x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 149x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 130x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 172x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |