Hp-pavilion VG265AA-ABF p6233fr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion VG265AA-ABF p6233fr  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON EVANS
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 12:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 80.8
42% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 79
8-Core 77
10% 78 Pts
64-Core 78.4
5% 78.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 57 62 13 14 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 74.9
Write 67.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 34.5
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 57%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 15 14 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 15.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 16.2
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.4
173% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VG265AA-ABF p6233fr Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion VG265AA-ABF p6233fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback