Asrock EP2C602

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock EP2C602 (all builds)
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '17 at 15:37
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 884 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 116 52% 84 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 463 41% 347 Pts	64-Core 1,192 74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 54 Parallax 60.6 58% 61.7 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 71.1 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,063 Write 1,452 Mixed 1,129 273% 1,215 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 47.7 180% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 117 122% 204 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 283%
Team L5 SSD 120G 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 31GB free Firmware: 4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 114 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1216 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 297 (A3) Unknown 100 100 13 (A4) Unknown 100 100 54055 (A5) Unknown 100 100 102 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 68 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4150 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 61056 (F2) Unknown 100 100 77980 (F5) Unknown 100 100 108110	57.4% Above average	Read 398 Write 133 Mixed 199 53% 243 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 23.5 83% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 58.2 75% 136 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 5GB free Firmware: EMT0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 415 Write 397 Mixed 403 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 17.2 71% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 67.1 74% 126 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 104 Write 109 Mixed 109 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.28 105% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 356GB free Firmware: CC45 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 85.9 Write 76.3 Mixed 78.2 60% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.54 105% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 69%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 39GB free Firmware: 1C03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 73 (03) Spinup time 188 175 5591 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5424 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 2 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 848 (BE) vendor-specific 56 32 44 (C2) HDA temperature 106 82 44 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 182 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 183 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 39 (C8) Write error rate 200 183 0	21.4% Poor	Read 47.7 Write 26.8 Mixed 38.2 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.18 44% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 35%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 12GB free Firmware: 3V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 6 (03) Spinup time 194 192 3275 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2393 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 7 7 67965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1296 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 570 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2400 (C2) HDA temperature 115 94 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.9% Average	Read 79.3 Write 80.1 Mixed 72 58% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.69 164% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 68%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 9GB free Firmware: 03.0 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 85.9 Write 105 Mixed 87.5 70% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.72 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 8x8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 34.2 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.7 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EP2C602 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	3x
900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GBIntel $160Bench 440%, 3,427 samples	3x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- 32GBSamsungBench 51%, 16 samples	3x
M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 52 samples	3x
HMT42GR7MFR4C 4x16GBHynixBench 72%, 48 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16