Colorful H310M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Colorful H310M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful H310M-E
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210720
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '22 at 22:15
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 85.3 1-Core 134 2-Core 254 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 649 69% 549 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 143 Parallax 131 105% 134 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 134 Splatting 118 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$76 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 57 79 80 82 58 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 408 Write 123 Mixed 196 SusWrite 77.5 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 18.7 87% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 8.5 DQ Mixed 0.2 22% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 168 170 172 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 164 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 164 97% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 108%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 144 144 146 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 135 Write 133 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 144 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$33 14,163 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.2% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 20.7 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 22.7 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-E Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Colorful H310M-E

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	3x
Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	2x
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
256GB 256GBRX7Bench 63%, 50 samples	2x
128GB 128GBV-gen03sm22ar128sdkBench 69%, 39 samples	2x
Green SATA M.2 240GBWD $76Bench 52%, 5,323 samples	2x

RAM
D4H4GL26A8TS5 2x4GBUnknownBench 82%, 43 samples	3x
CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 0A94 D4R4GL24A8R 12GBUnknownBench 47%, 2 samples	2x
Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $33Bench 74%, 14,163 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16