Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 282
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 748
75% 608 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 110
Parallax 67.6
57% 82.5 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 69
Splatting 67.3
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 327 327 325 314 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,997
Write 1,436
Mixed 637
SusWrite 369
245% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 58.3
252% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 654
592% 899 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 224%
Great: 236%
USB 3.0 480GB
65GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.5% Poor
Read 147
Write 203
Mixed 178
SusWrite 37
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 14.7
40% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 63.9
DQ Write 55.5
DQ Mixed 58.6
44% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 63%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
549GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 133 132 134 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 163
Write 132
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 133
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
338GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 185 178 182 177 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 121
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 180
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 112%
USB 3.0 164GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 33.6
Write 34.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 36.9
25% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback