Lenovo 30A0A0HL00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30A0A0HL00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 02:08
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 465
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTLAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 177 177 218 276 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 334
Write 196
Mixed 246
SusWrite 223
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 25.5
81% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 237
188% 267 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
107GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 200
Write 162
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 101
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A0A0HL00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 30A0A0HL00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback