Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 133 58% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 612 56% 467 Pts	64-Core 821 51% 821 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Matrox M9128 LP PCIe x16 21 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(102B 22C0) 1GB Driver: MxMUm64.dll Ver. 2.5.0.227 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.11% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.1 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.11% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 414 410 432 442 442 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 410 Write 404 Mixed 348 SusWrite 424 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 40.5 119% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 256 194% 261 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 1x8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	35% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 8.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	64x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	64x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	40x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	56x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	42x
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples	24x

RAM
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 283 samples	34x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GBHynixBench 94%, 307 samples	22x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	19x