Lenovo 20H5006FAD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20H5006FAD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20H5006FAD
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 14:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 117
56% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 138
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 505C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4727
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 5.7
5% 8.07 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 510 358 169 329 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 986
Write 776
Mixed 117
SusWrite 345
123% 556 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 26.5
82% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 104
98% 160 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
677GB free
Firmware: 08.01A08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 105 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 87
Write 105
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 104
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 Transcend JM3200HSH-4G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20H5006FAD Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20H5006FAD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback