Acer Aspire A514-52K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-52K  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sneezy_KL
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 05:14
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 137
59% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 220
32% 232 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 137B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.8
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 671
Write 566
Mixed 326
115% 521 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.3
185% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 382
286% 382 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 155%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
751GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 113 106 111 117 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 143
Write 116
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 111
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
176% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D22.2318BH.001 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-52K Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-52K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback