Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock B560M-C (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210721
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '22 at 03:38
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$178 9,286 User benchmarks, average bench 99% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 84.3 1-Core 168 2-Core 324 103% 192 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 960 91% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,194 74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2060) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 106 Parallax 122 93% 114 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 99.9 Splatting 92 87% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB 23,579 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 323GB free (System drive) Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 817 340 377 350 368 334 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,964 Write 2,068 Mixed 1,663 SusWrite 431 343% 1,532 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 81.5 294% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1311 DQ Write 933 DQ Mixed 1,057 807% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 271%
Toshiba External USB 750GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 217GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 23 22 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 33.9 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 22.4 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 63%
Jmicron Tech 1TB 1,595 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 211GB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 59 60 60 59 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 65.4 Write 67.9 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 58.9 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 76%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 1TB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 930GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 35.8 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 21.1 23% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB 3,312 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 40.6 Write 37.2 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 21.3 25% 34 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 79%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 5.8 5.9 6.1 7.3 5.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 10.4 Write 2.7 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 6.2 10% 7.77 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
PNY USB 3.2.1 FD 32GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 21GB free, PID 1006 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 128 Write 51.6 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 14.6 53% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 25%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 51GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 20.6 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 11.7 27% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.4 125% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 22,102 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 28.8 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 25.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

CPU
Core i7-11700FIntelBench 98%, 21,161 samples	1,243x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	984x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	419x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	875x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	537x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	404x

SSD
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples	388x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	379x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	302x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	383x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	362x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	237x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16