bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2.3 GB free of 3.99609 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 18:33
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 284
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 536
73% 545 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 590
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 106
57% 80.1 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 47.6
50% 63.4 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 43GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 938
Write 883
Mixed 794
194% 872 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 30.4
98% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 582
427% 561 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 3GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 1020 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback