Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 128 61% 98 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 193 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000 106 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21E8) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.6 2% 1.63 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 368 434 406 396 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 426 Write 393 Mixed 326 SusWrite 386 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 33.2 110% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 265 198% 265 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BAS0-DJ-F 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	1x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x
EBJ81UG8BAS0-DJ-F 1x8GBElpidaBench 27%, 73 samples	1x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16