Intel X79G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 24 months ago.
SystemIntel X79
MotherboardIntel X79G  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 15:53
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 125
50% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 469
43% 359 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 93.2
56% 75.5 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 48.3
50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IND-S325S/240GB 240GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V84T2c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 361 357 362 367 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 463
Write 365
Mixed 344
SusWrite 360
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 22.9
77% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.9
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 166
122% 156 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
454GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 106 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 83.9
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 104
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79G Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback