Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory22.8 GB free of 63.9961 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 15:03
Run Duration1385 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU 1, 16 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 23
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 75.8
25% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 349
29% 254 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 322GB
168GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 152 163 154 154 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.9% Poor
Read 267
Write 206
Mixed 196
SusWrite 151
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 4.7
20% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 67%
Xensrc PVDISK 107GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 152 162 152 152 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 164
Mixed 185
SusWrite 150
133% 178 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 4.4
882% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 63GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16380 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 21
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 11.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 299
13% 299 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback