| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121008 |
| Uptime | 2.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '22 at 20:40 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | ARM-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
65% 109 Pts
|
37% 277 Pts
|
17% 275 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.6%
Above average
|
53% 64.4 fps
|
50% 60.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 26 26 64 56 MB/s
|
20.2%
Poor
|
15% 67.6 MB/s
|
40% 9.63 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
420GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 119 118 120 122 MB/s
|
72.3%
Very good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
148% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston M471B5273BH1-CH9 859B ST51264BA1339.16FM 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.9%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
56% 71.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,418 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 198x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 151x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 140x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 149x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 90x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |