Lenovo 20BFS2EC00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 29% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20BFS2EC00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFS2EC00
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150903
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 35.6
27% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 65.9
8-Core 94.7
10% 80.3 Pts
64-Core 94.1
6% 94.1 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2210) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7.3
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 75 25 101 53 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 435
Write 349
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 54.6
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-435.A01LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BFS2EC00 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BFS2EC00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback