Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 09:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 667
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1296
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.1% Very good
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 132
Parallax 82.8
72% 101 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 104
Splatting 95.7
92% 116 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1863 1695 1538 1447 1354 1293 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,790
Write 1,133
Mixed 1,212
SusWrite 1,532
318% 1,417 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 76.4
264% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1159
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 990
737% 984 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 290%
Great: 355%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 115 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 19.9
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 118
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
257% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGS88C-26N1900 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 26
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P95_96_97Ex,Rx Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback