Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 06:25
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 112
2-Core 191
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 556
61% 482 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 32.7
26% 32 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 21
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1574 1552 1568 1499 1074 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 954
Write 1,433
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 1,252
266% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 57.2
194% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 906
684% 923 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 216%
Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
416GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 449 452 444 435 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 414
Mixed 404
SusWrite 421
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 37.2
141% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 345
260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback