MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 23:13
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 899
85% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,456
90% 1,456 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
180% Outstanding
Lighting 255
Reflection 235
Parallax 291
208% 260 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 224
Splatting 163
183% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 180%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 928 1129 1043 1045 1044 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,672
Write 2,315
Mixed 241
SusWrite 954
342% 1,546 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 89.5
306% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1275
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 412
459% 792 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 304%
Great: 372%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 141 143 142 143 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 224
Mixed 112
SusWrite 143
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
472% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 118%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 171 163 155 165 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 164
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 166
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
241% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 215 216 216 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 121%
ORICO H/ W RAID5 24TB
10TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 210 222 221 232 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.2% Very good
Read 182
Write 165
Mixed 39
SusWrite 217
200% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.4
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 37.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $728
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback