HP 750-417c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP 750-417c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 20:52
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 348
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Dell(1028 3796) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.7% Good
Lighting 82.4
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 78
67% 81.7 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 67.1
66% 83 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 166 178 178 140 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 181
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 151
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
922GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 208 212 213 176 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 157
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 193
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5120MB86H9F-2400 Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 12GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-417c Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-417c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback