TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 489
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 70.4%
 Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 3.7
9% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S8FA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 249 83 109 95 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 472
Write 401
Mixed 361
SusWrite 153
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 46.8
146% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 117
144% 255 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 88.7%
 Great: 106%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 118 117 116 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 115
Write 114
Mixed 59
SusWrite 117
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 66.5%
 Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
460GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 95 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 66.2
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 93.4
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 52.3%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 54%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples1,031x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples856x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples313x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples993x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples335x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples227x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples146x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples52x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples41x
RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples53x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples40x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback