HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84E7
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 20:19
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 134
44% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 345
48% 353 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.45.01.05
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 13.8
0% 8.77 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 11.8
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 74 64 84 72 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 139
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 75.4
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2400, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback