Besstar HM50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemBesstar HM50  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR HM50
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 807
84% 675 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 20.4
12% 17.1 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 17
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 1TB
924GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80003E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1212 1152 1147 1004 357 373 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,220
Mixed 1,241
SusWrite 874
271% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 70.5
246% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 1,073
DQ Mixed 455
500% 834 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 235%
Great: 237%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4 6.8 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 10.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 10.6
15% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 28.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 20.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM50 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Besstar HM50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback