EVOO EG-LP10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemEVOO EG-LP10  (all builds)
MotherboardEVOO GK5MP5V
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 17:26
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 205
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 545
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Device(1D05 1085) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 24.1
5% 18.1 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 34
22% 25 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PM8256GPTCB4B8TF-E13T2A 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 886
Write 1,230
Mixed 894
226% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 54.4
175% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 495
388% 550 MB/s
Poor: 117% Great: 216%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
62GB free
Firmware: S1111j0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 365 455 207 292 764 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 1026
Mixed 716
SusWrite 442
208% 936 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 13.6
127% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 530
424% 604 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 154%
Great: 291%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
14GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 0.5 1.3 28 28 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 32.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 16.4
13% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.1
261% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8945 GKE800SO102408-3200 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 16
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EG-LP10 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: EVOO EG-LP10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback