TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 11D0CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 11D0CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 315F
Memory86.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 1,013
92% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,847
114% 1,847 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 89.8%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Lighting 97.1
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 79.8
79% 89 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 71.8
60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 72.5%
 Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB
929GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1682 1590 1524 1413 1409 1455 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 2,263
Mixed 1,507
SusWrite 1,512
418% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64.1
223% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 393
407% 687 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑
This bench: 285%
 Great: 369%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
193GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 122 123 122 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 122
66% 91 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 64.7%
 Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
965GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 219 219 219 220 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 105
Write 121
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 218
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 92.7%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W644GU44J1293NH 85F7 W644GU44J1293NH Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CVF 95GB
2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 19.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 11D0CTO1WW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 11D0CTO1WW

CPU
Core i9-10900Intel  $281Bench 94%, 11,130 samples11x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples4x
GTX 1660Nvidia  $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples3x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples1x
SSD
Green SN350 1TBWDBench 262%, 10,028 samples4x
MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TBSamsungBench 277%, 523 samples3x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples3x
RAM
HMA82GU6DJR8N-WM 2x16GBHynixBench 90%, 87 samples5x
M378A4G43AB2-CVF Kingston 9905734-157.A00G 63GBSamsungBench 88%, 3 samples3x
M378A4G43AB2-CVF 85F7 W644GU44J1293NH 85F7 W644GU44J1293NH 95GBSamsungBench 67%, 2 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback