HP ENVY Sleekbook 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY Sleekbook 6  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 195E
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 11:48
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 126
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 199
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 195E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5
Parallax 2.8
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD mSATA 128GB-$159
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04MH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 184 175 183 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 382
Write 181
Mixed 221
SusWrite 173
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 13
63% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 29.5
45% 86 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Iptime External 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 24.3
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 27
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7.6
1,288% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Sleekbook 6 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY Sleekbook 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback