TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion MD35221

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35221  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MPG Z490 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C79)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 01:20
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 175
2-Core 339
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,111
106% 874 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 97.6%
 Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Zotac(19DA 9612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 313
Reflection 297
Parallax 366
255% 325 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 260
Splatting 192
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 212%
 Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12S-2TB-PHISON-SSD-B27B 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1749 1097 1103 1052 1033 1085 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
254% Outstanding
Read 1,365
Write 2,120
Mixed 1,475
SusWrite 1,186
348% 1,536 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 62.9
229% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1456
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,235
937% 1,267 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
133GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 189 191 190 190 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 92.5
Write 108
Mixed 76
SusWrite 188
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 80.5%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 25.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 80.2%
 Great: 118%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MD35221 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 202%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

System: Medion MD35221

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel  $234Bench 101%, 65,651 samples5x
GPU
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $580Bench 204%, 155,335 samples5x
SSD
E12S-2TB-PHISON-SSD-B27B 2TBBench 267%, 140 samples3x
E12S-2TB-PHISON- 2TBNvmeBench 217%, 15 samples1x
E12S-2TB-PHISON-SSD-B27B 2TBNvmeBench 254%, 1 sample1x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $815
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback