Asus P7Q57-M DO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 24 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7Q57-M DO (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110511
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '22 at 16:30
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 133 54% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 173 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 39.2 32% 39.8 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 28.2 28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 22 26 55 48 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 102 Write 99.2 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 40.4 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 70%
Seagate ST3320620AS 300GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 95GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 52 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 36.5 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 51.5 32% 42.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 43%
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54 7,200 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 271GB free Firmware: GS001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 52 52 52 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 49 Write 44.2 Mixed 33.4 SusWrite 51.5 33% 44.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 12.3 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7Q57-M DO Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7Q57-M DO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	12x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	6x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	3x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
545s Series 256GBIntel $79Bench 96%, 17,432 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	20x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16