Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 MB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 5 MB  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '22 at 01:25
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 222
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 655
68% 545 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 3.9
2% 22.9 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 6.2
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 252 261 224 251 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 1,158
Mixed 1,099
SusWrite 273
236% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 74.1
239% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 205
231% 409 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 183%
Great: 244%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
778GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2188 2106 1500 1545 1562 1561 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,488
Write 2224
Mixed 1,691
SusWrite 1,744
457% 2,037 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 74.9
241% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 860
647% 871 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 320%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6D1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 5 MB Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 5 MB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback