Lenovo 20J9S0A200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20J9S0A200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20J9S0A200
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3965U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 137
59% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 130
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 2249) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 125 122 130 127 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 363
Write 331
Mixed 273
SusWrite 132
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 281
213% 289 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20J9S0A200 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20J9S0A200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback