Asus M2N68-AM Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M2N68-AM Plus  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100823
Uptime11 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 21:09
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 700e
AM2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 73.2
42% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 110
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
XFX(1682 3170) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 15
Parallax 13.1
12% 14.2 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10.5
9% 11 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721032SLA 320GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST2O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,492
Write 35
Mixed 70.3
383% 533 MB/s
4K Read 281
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2
11,932% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
64GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,525
Write 10.3
Mixed 23.8
353% 520 MB/s
4K Read 365
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.9
1,450% 123 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68-AM Plus Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68-AM Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback